“Content isn’t King, it’s the Kingdom”
Lee Odden
Shifting from an audience with more time than money, to one with more money than time
BitTorrent/µTorrent was not a product, it was a utility. A download manager of shorts. The transformation needed was to approach that of an "Open iTunes": A destination for all your media and content management needs, open to content partners and focused to the viral expansion of membership through the instigation of personal sharing and broadcast.
From "downloading files" to "content discovery"
BitTorrent's new software, code-named "Chrysalis Project" (aka BT v8 Alpha), was the next generation of its mainline client in early 2011. In addition to a complete redesign of the interface, UX, and all features, the beta revealed a new capability previously unseen in any other BitTorrent client: Personal content channels. Users of the Version 8 of BitTorrent were given a choice of user experience on their BitTorrent client: A "classic" one (named "retro") respecting the legacy Ul for those comfortable with the way things were (albeit more technical) ...and a newer, more content-centric, channel-driven, simplified experience (Friendly, Fun, Media-Rich). This is one of many best practices available to introduce product innovation and reaching new demographics …without upsetting the established loyal user base (typically reticent to change).
Open-source iTunes alternative
We believe Interface has to offer delightful moments that self-justify themselves (Like the warning for a missing DVD-ROM, sliding up and partially obfuscating the "Burn" action until is taken care of). We rewarded users with a badge-based reputation system, to encourage optimal use of the BitTorrent ecosystem (i.e. leaving the client activated at night, increasing bandwidth for uploading, etc). Beyond mere apps, the "channels" represented the second foray of BitTorrent into partnering with content providers as well as the introduction of personal, shareable, user-generated channels of content. Many of the more technical aspects of Torrent management were hidden or delegated to second-level reveal, in an attempt to put more emphasis on the content, less on the process of how to get it. For example, the speed of files was categorized as relative "Fast", "Slow", etc... versus a cryptic 23 Mbit/, especially to the novice users we were aiming for.